Peer Review Comments

I left comments on Bianca's post, Bassam's post, and Melissa's post.


Bianca-Hola, Bianca, I think your RD was very strong, but I also think that you should try to give some facts about smallpox. When you "The whole book is based off of smallpox, so when the author used real facts, it made it more genuine and realistic, which is a great thing to have included in a book." What were some of the real facts that the author included? Another thing you can do is describe the background of the author in the introduction. This make it clear that the author knows her facts. <---It will make it more believable. Overall great job!

Bassam- Bassam, I think you need to elaborate a lot more on your points. For Example, when you say "book is breath tacking", elaborate on HOW it is breathtaking, do it provide very detailed imagery? Or do the words make you feel awesome. You also need to provide TAGS in the introduction, tell the reader some background about the book. You also need to make the post longer, at least 800 words I think.

Melissa-Hola Melissa, Tony thinks Melissa should include TAGS in her introduction, so that readers can get a basic understanding of what the book was about. Tony also thinks that you could relate some of what Ronnie does in the book to what some teenagers do everyday. Other than that, this was a pretty good book review.